Tea Party – No Taxation Without "WHITE FACE" Representation?
|They got the Tea Party.
We got the “P” Party.
The record will relfect that I was often found elsewhere in mind and body during my Advance Placement American History classes in high school, yet I was there for just enough time to get what I needed to know.
According to the story, the United States of America was started due to a dispute with colonists from England, in America due to the King Of Britain levying taxes against the colonists and not adequately showing the colonist where the tax revenues were being spent in areas beneficial to the interest of the taxpayers.
Then, I can add my part of the story which is rarely emphasized in history books, which says that
African Slaves were to offer free labor for the benefit of the society in which the colonists resided, displeased with taxation without proper representation from the British monarchy and government, which led to a subsequent organization of a deceleration of independence, revolt, and development of a new script which was better suited to the needs and views of those same colonists?
“No taxation without representation” began as a slogan in the period 1763–1776 that summarized a primary grievance of the British colonists in the Thirteen Colonies. In short, many in those colonies believed the lack of direct representation in the distant British Parliament was an illegal denial of their rights as Englishmen, and therefore laws taxing the colonists (the kind of law that affects the most individuals directly), and other laws applying only to the colonies, were unconstitutional. In recent times, it has been used by several other groups in several different countries over similar disputes.
Wikipedia Link.
Fast forward to the year 2010 and all subsequent historical events, and see that the 44th President Of The United States, would have represented the face of that free labor African Slave 3/5 th’s of a man class, during the time of the organization of the revolt which led to the script being written which allows citizens of the colonies united, and now nation of states to elect their leaders and lawmakers with whichever face they believe to be most to their liking?
Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser tonight, President Obama touted his administration’s tax cuts and said that the recent tea party rallies across the nation have “amused†him.
“You would think they should be saying thank you,†the president said to applause.
Members of the audience shouted, “Thank you.â€
ABC News Blog Link
I will stick to the smart rule of thumb which says that it is never ideal to argue about religion and politics, and say that when it comes to The Law, which is actually based on The Constitution in the U.S.A., with the current
Chief Executive as a Harvard Law School Graduate and former
Constitutional Law Professor at the University Of Chicago, it will most likely all boil down to the rules of Pimpology, which are, were, and will continue to be based on
The Ladies Choice.
In my humble opinion, Tea Parties are for girls and women, take Sarah Palin for example.
A different perspective to consider.